PDA

View Full Version : opinions?



©hris
06-17-2008, 04:16 PM
looks like the G35 is gonna be totalled... they are at $16800 in damages so far and Allstate pretty much said start looking for a new car. im only 95% sure its gonna be totalled... if it is totalled...

whats your opinion on this???

Revmaynard
06-17-2008, 04:18 PM
Nice cars, drove one once. It's not very practical though, it was too low for my neighborhood with no speed bumps. But just my two pennies.

Ran
06-17-2008, 04:18 PM
Z3 > Z4

I'd be fearful of the maintenance if anything were to go wrong on a late-model BMW.

Alan®
06-17-2008, 04:21 PM
Z4 ftl

©hris
06-17-2008, 04:21 PM
i really want a drop top and there arent many drop tops that arent chick cars lol I really think this BMW would be a blast to drive. would definatly look forward to taking some trips to the beach and the mountains in it for sure.

osnap
06-17-2008, 04:22 PM
if you want a convertible with some balls, why not get a clean low-mileage AP1?

Revmaynard
06-17-2008, 04:23 PM
You could always get an S2K or 350Z vert for a newer car. I would get a clean ass E30. I love those in vert.

Lucky DAWG
06-17-2008, 04:23 PM
I wanted one until i was informed that like 90% of people who drive them are middle aged women.


nice car though, i like the red interior with the black.




if you like it i say go for it.

Ran
06-17-2008, 04:26 PM
i really want a drop top and there arent many drop tops that arent chick cars lol I really think this BMW would be a blast to drive. would definatly look forward to taking some trips to the beach and the mountains in it for sure.MX-5 Miata

Go Mazdaspeed so you can get the factory turbo, or go regular model and put on a Flyin' Miata turbo kit.

/thread

©hris
06-17-2008, 04:27 PM
The Z vert is hard to find less than $25k w/ low miles. i did find one close by w/ navi that im gonna go look at today though. The S2K I like too ...but i dunno

Alan®
06-17-2008, 04:30 PM
The Z vert is hard to find less than $25k w/ low miles. i did find one close by w/ navi that im gonna go look at today though. The S2K I like too ...but i dunno
if you want an auto i might be able to hook you up

Ran
06-17-2008, 04:30 PM
S2K's are sweet looking, but they don't have the room that I need personally. Not sure how that affects you though. Also, that frame bump in the floorboard infront of the seats is annoying as all hell.

osnap
06-17-2008, 04:32 PM
http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/showthread.php?t=179770&page=2

maybe the last couple of posts on this page of this thread will make the decision easier for you. :goodjob:

JITB
06-17-2008, 04:40 PM
z3!
mazdaspeed miata!

Ran
06-17-2008, 04:43 PM
http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/showthread.php?t=179770&page=2

maybe the last couple of posts on this page of this thread will make the decision easier for you. :goodjob:http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x72/SpecialK86_photos/RANDOM%20STUFF/93949678zmPs53LhIMG_5194fcopy.jpg
Oh my sweet lord... :idb:

Brett
06-17-2008, 04:43 PM
looks like the G35 is gonna be totalled... they are at $16800 in damages so far and Allstate pretty much said start looking for a new car. im only 95% sure its gonna be totalled... if it is totalled...

whats your opinion on this???

I think that body style is butt ugly and I dont know how staright you would look in one of those, Gay guys car and a b*tches car

©hris
06-17-2008, 04:45 PM
I think that body style is butt ugly and I dont know how staright you would look in one of those, Gay guys car and a b*tches car


.... lol same thing u rollin in except it has a circle emblem rather than an H lol

Brett
06-17-2008, 04:45 PM
taking some trips to the beach and the mountains in it for sure.

then get a s2k, cause that bmw wont do sh*t in the mountains, get a car with a backbone, that Z4 isnt one

©hris
06-17-2008, 04:46 PM
then get a s2k, cause that bmw wont do sh*t in the mountains, get a car with a backbone, that Z4 isnt one

.... damnit i hate buying cars lol now i dunno what to get.

im gonna look at a Z vert today and see how she drives

slostang
06-17-2008, 04:46 PM
s2000 :goodjob:

Ran
06-17-2008, 04:47 PM
im gonna look at a Z vert today and see how she drivesLike a cow on skates.

90_ACCORD
06-17-2008, 04:50 PM
yeah it not a bad looking car
but if your gonna spend a good penny for one then you can find something better

JITB
06-17-2008, 04:53 PM
i dont know how fun a vert will be as your only car... if it is gonna be.

thinkfast®
06-17-2008, 04:55 PM
GET YOU A '61 BUBBLETOP OR A SIX TRE RAG HOMEY, YOU WONT LET ANYONE DOWN AND GET MAJOR POINTS IN THE "IM A MAN" DEPARTMENT

ALL THESE CARS IN HERE HAVE BEEN A LETDOWN (SORRY BERT)

WHERE IS THE LOVE MAN.. GO CLASSIC, GO MUSCLE, GO CHEVY

Revmaynard
06-17-2008, 04:59 PM
I'd rather have a vert Mopar over a Chevy any day, but I could probably afford a vert Chevy before a Mopar. lol

Lucky DAWG
06-17-2008, 05:00 PM
GET YOU A '61 BUBBLETOP OR A SIX TRE RAG HOMEY, YOU WONT LET ANYONE DOWN AND GET MAJOR POINTS IN THE "IM A MAN" DEPARTMENT

ALL THESE CARS IN HERE HAVE BEEN A LETDOWN (SORRY BERT)

WHERE IS THE LOVE MAN.. GO CLASSIC, GO MUSCLE, GO CHEVY


although i would agree with you that i love an old 1960's or 70's Camaro, thats clearly what hes not in the market for.


Thats probably why everyone is suggesting S2000 and Miatas because they are similar cars.


Hes not going to jump from wanting a Z4 to a F-350 Dually if you catch my drift

redrumracer
06-17-2008, 05:01 PM
MX-5 Miata

Go Mazdaspeed so you can get the factory turbo, or go regular model and put on a Flyin' Miata turbo kit.

/thread
x2 so far

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:07 PM
.... damnit i hate buying cars lol now i dunno what to get.

im gonna look at a Z vert today and see how she drives

350 is way to heavy for a mountain car brotha

JITB
06-17-2008, 05:07 PM
x2 so far
x3
http://www.autobytel.com/images/carPics/TestDrv/Lyons/400/04_Mazdaspd_Miata_ft2.jpg

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:08 PM
i dont know how fun a vert will be as your only car... if it is gonna be.

I can answer that... ITS A BLAST!!! AND I ALWAYS HAVE A SUNTAN just by driving home each day

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:09 PM
GO CLASSIC, GO MUSCLE, GO CHEVY

GO FUK YOURSELF :D

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:10 PM
x3
http://www.autobytel.com/images/carPics/TestDrv/Lyons/400/04_Mazdaspd_Miata_ft2.jpg

... car with a intercooler thats looks like a childs tooth...LOL

JITB
06-17-2008, 05:10 PM
I can answer that... ITS A BLAST!!! AND I ALWAYS HAVE A SUNTAN just by driving home each day


you havent had yours for that long tho... and dont u have another car to drive!

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:14 PM
I have had mine for 9 months and thats daily driving it in Fall, Winter, Spring and now summer, and I LOVE IT :)

My wife has her SUV but I dont drive that

JITB
06-17-2008, 05:16 PM
... car with a intercooler thats looks like a childs tooth...LOL

it adds character!

Leadfoot_mf
06-17-2008, 05:18 PM
i really want a drop top and there arent many drop tops that arent chick cars lol I really think this BMW would be a blast to drive. would definatly look forward to taking some trips to the beach and the mountains in it for sure.i guess you didnt get the memo that is also a chick car, way more than a s2000.

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:23 PM
although i would agree with you that i love an old 1960's or 70's Camaro, thats clearly what hes not in the market for.


Thats probably why everyone is suggesting S2000 and Miatas because they are similar cars.


Hes not going to jump from wanting a Z4 to a F-350 Dually if you catch my drift

Yeah Ricky you dumb son of a b*tch

redrumracer
06-17-2008, 05:27 PM
I can answer that... ITS A BLAST!!! AND I ALWAYS HAVE A SUNTAN just by driving home each day
my left arm has one hell of a tan, i dont like to put the top down, i hate convertibles :crazy:

this is by far the mx5 that i would prefer to drive
http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh24/xxredrumracerxx/MiataCoupe2_2004.gif

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:29 PM
lmao both my arms have a great tan, Top down ftmfw

redrumracer
06-17-2008, 05:32 PM
lmao both my arms have a great tan, Top down ftmfw
lol i remember when i was first like you, then after a year of having the top down it got old, lol(no puns intended)

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:33 PM
hahaha nah I love having the top down and I think the car looks sexier with it down :D

JITB
06-17-2008, 05:34 PM
my left arm has one hell of a tan, i dont like to put the top down, i hate convertibles :crazy:

this is by far the mx5 that i would prefer to drive
http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh24/xxredrumracerxx/MiataCoupe2_2004.gif


i wish they would have made a miata coupe...:(

redrumracer
06-17-2008, 05:35 PM
i wish they would have made a miata coupe...:(
they did just not in the US

Brett
06-17-2008, 05:37 PM
I didnt know they ever did make it

JITB
06-17-2008, 05:38 PM
they did just not in the US

http://www.emperorshotz.com/nbc_the_more_you_know.jpg

didnt know that...wow.

blaknoize
06-17-2008, 05:42 PM
^u sir need to play Gran Turismo

IndianStig
06-17-2008, 05:44 PM
Z3 > Z4

I'd be fearful of the maintenance if anything were to go wrong on a late-model BMW.

4 year/50k miles

everything you hear about BMW being unreliable is BS, they have their **** together. you'd be just as likely to get a ****ty benz as a BMW, everyone has bad apples in the bunch.


why not get a m3? is it a 6spd?

Dirty Octopus™
06-17-2008, 05:44 PM
get something that wont be wrecked in 3 weeks.

like a Nissan Sentra :goodjob:

Nissan Sean
06-17-2008, 05:56 PM
go for the Z vert, the back end is a lil ugly, but its a good car/similar to your G. and l it ooks really good with the top down, plus it has power, unlike the miata.lol @ all these miata fan boys on here. and dont get the Z4.it will make you look like the gayez. Z vert FTW!!!!!!!!. it will be plenty fun in the mountains!!!! and add some coilovers and it will be awesome!

redrumracer
06-17-2008, 06:04 PM
go for the Z vert, the back end is a lil ugly, but its a good car/similar to your G. and l it ooks really good with the top down, plus it has power, unlike the miata.lol @ all these miata fan boys on here. and dont get the Z4.it will make you look like the gayez. Z vert FTW!!!!!!!!. it will be plenty fun in the mountains!!!! and add some coilovers and it will be awesome!
add one dose of turbo and problem solved, the miata motor handles and accepts boost reallllllyyyyyyy well

Leadfoot_mf
06-17-2008, 06:17 PM
go for the Z vert, the back end is a lil ugly, but its a good car/similar to your G. and l it ooks really good with the top down, plus it has power, unlike the miata.lol @ all these miata fan boys on here. and dont get the Z4.it will make you look like the gayez. Z vert FTW!!!!!!!!. it will be plenty fun in the mountains!!!! and add some coilovers and it will be awesome!lol at z fan boys :blah: :blah: :blah:

Revmaynard
06-17-2008, 06:20 PM
His name is Nissan Sean for god's sake. Their sn's don't even relate to Mazda at all.

twinj
06-17-2008, 06:23 PM
Hell to the **** No!!!! Please dont buy that. Take a look at the BMW 135 or the 335 those mofo are sick.

twinj
06-17-2008, 06:27 PM
if you want an auto i might be able to hook you up

I wish you was at that dealership before I bought my truck.

Bruce Leroy
06-17-2008, 06:58 PM
I would look for a used e46 m3... You could probably get a nice one for around 25 thousand.

Heres one on autotrader (http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?ct=p&car_id=243364258&dealer_id=62489785&car_year=2002&num_records=25&model=M3&systime=&make2=&start_year=2000&engine=&keywordsfyc=&keywordsfyc=&keywordsrep=&keywordsrep=&certified=&body_code=1&fuel=&awsp=false&search_type=both&distance=200&marketZipError=false&search_lang=en&make=BMW&color=&keywords_display=&page_location=findacar%3A%3Aispsearchform&min_price=&body_style=CONVERT&drive=&default_sort=priceDESC&position=top&max_mileage=&style_flag=2&sort_type=priceASC&address=30004&advanced=&end_year=2009&transmission=&doors=&max_price=&cardist=11)

mocha latte cupcake
06-17-2008, 07:06 PM
hmmm

s2k... droppin panties since year 2000.


350z... all the power of a thoroughbred stallion and all the weight of a..... elephant...

Z4... If it doesn't say M... it wasn't meant for a HIM

OneSlow5pt0
06-17-2008, 07:07 PM
how bout a SLK 320? thats what id want for a roadster

TheGodfather
06-17-2008, 07:15 PM
The only drop top car I'd rock now a days would be the S2k only because there is not other choice and it looks damn sexy with a hard top.

Hard tops are always an option, IE SC430, but that isn't a mountain car by any means.

Alan®
06-17-2008, 07:21 PM
what about a old slk32 amg?

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:14 PM
The posts in this thread have made me lol like a mufuker....

Chris, you've seen my BMW and ridden it and you know that I'm far from a chick or a fag at that....The Z4 is a fun car and it has a fit and finish that is def superior to that of the Miata or the S2k..... Handles just as well as any car previously suggested in this thread. Not to mention that you can buy a hardtop, though a bit pricey.....

Also for all the naysayers, I fuked up a few s2ks in the time that I owned my car. I would recommend the 3.0. Add a supercharger and it's hella fun.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:17 PM
Also what car on the face of this earth does a woman NOT drive?....I have seen more women in s2k's lately than men and let's not even get on the issue of Miatas. At the end of the day, there aren't too many cars that can be labeled as chick cars...


Edit: I have noticed a shyt ton of women driving vettes lately...Does that make the vette a "chick car"?

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:18 PM
z4 is GAY.

Id get an S2000, cheap, reliable, easy to maintain, great handling, easy to mod, etc.

Or id get a C5 vette Vert

those would be my 2 choices

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:20 PM
z4 is GAY.

Id get an S2000, cheap, reliable, easy to maintain, great handling, easy to mod, etc.

Or id get a C5 vette Vert

those would be my 2 choices


Yea, the z4 is gay.:rolleyes:

I guess you've never run against, seen or heard a z4m at wot huh?

Chuckster
06-17-2008, 08:25 PM
Z vert = ghey
Z coupe = better
Z coupeM = bada$$

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:28 PM
Yea, the z4 is gay.:rolleyes:

I guess you've never run against, seen or heard a z4m at wot huh?
yeah i have, an its a PIECE OF SHI T

Just as underpowered and ugly as the younger Z3

I mean its ok if you have vagina

3600 lbs and 255hp? gimme a break.


The S2000 has a 4 cylinder that makes 240hp an it only weighs 2800lbs.

AN S2000 would kill a z4 on a road course

Better transmission, higher redline, better suspension, etc etc etc

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:30 PM
Oh an the Z4 is almost $10,000 more than the S2000 if he was to buy a new one.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:30 PM
yeah i have, an its a PIECE OF SHI T

Just as underpowered and ugly as the younger Z3

I mean its ok if you have vagina

3600 lbs and 255hp? gimme a break.


The S2000 has a 4 cylinder that makes 240hp an it only weighs 2800lbs.

AN S2000 would kill a z4 on a road course



EL OH EL .....

But then again, why do I bother arguing with you?
I mean afterall, you know EVERYTHING.....

OneSlow5pt0
06-17-2008, 08:32 PM
but i really do feel sorry for for people that would never drive a car,cause of what others would think

ive had a miata(im not gay or girl)
ive had a celica(not a girl)
and 3rd gen camaro(im far from a redneck or hick)




and for the record ive seen just as many girls in S2000s as anyother roadster,well ive seen way more in S2000s then the girly car that is the MR-S too

x Resilience
06-17-2008, 08:33 PM
Z4 ftl

Your Eclipse FTL.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:33 PM
When I first got my car I raced a friend who owns an s2k, stock for stock, light to light and freeway runs and I beat him EVERY TIME.... Explain that...

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:34 PM
C5 Vertible

Weight 3248lbs
345hp
350 TQ
6 speed manual
SUSPENSION
Independent 5-link design with toe and camber adjustment, cast aluminum upper and lower control arms and knuckle, transverse monoleaf spring, steel stabilizer bar and tie rods, tubular u-jointed metal matrix composite driveshafts, gas-pressurized shock absorbers

Gets the same gas mileage as the Z4


Personally for the money id get the C5 Vette convertible, best power, handling, an its a chick magnet :)

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:34 PM
but i really do feel sorry for for people that would never drive a car,cause of what others would think

ive had a miata(im not gay or girl)
ive had a celica(not a girl)
and 3rd gen camaro(im far from a redneck or hick)




and for the record ive seen just as many girls in S2000s as anyother roadster,well ive seen way more in S2000s the the girly car that is the MR-S too


Reps, if I can ..:goodjob:

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:41 PM
When I first got my car I raced a friend who owns an s2k, stock for stock, light to light and freeway runs and I beat him EVERY TIME.... Explain that...
cause you base car data on ricer street racing. idiot

I beat a Ferrari 360 Modena one time in my 200hp Silvia, does that make my S13 better?!! no it means the other guy couldnt drive.

Honda S2000 Factory 1/4 Time 14.1
BMW Z4 Factory 1/4 Time 14.2

Now i dont expect you to be a great driver, but the z4 is not lighting fast, nor should you base your decisions on YOU BEATING YO BOI IN A SKREET RACE!

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:43 PM
but i really do feel sorry for for people that would never drive a car,cause of what others would think

ive had a miata(im not gay or girl)
ive had a celica(not a girl)
and 3rd gen camaro(im far from a redneck or hick)




and for the record ive seen just as many girls in S2000s as anyother roadster,well ive seen way more in S2000s then the girly car that is the MR-S too
oh i could care less about that, drive whatever you want.

I meant "its ok if you have a vagina" meaning the cars complete lack of balls in any performance area.

Miatas are cool, i mean just cause it has a chick car conotation doesnt mean anything

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:46 PM
cause you base car data on ricer street racing. idiot

I beat a Ferrari 360 Modena one time in my 200hp Silvia, does that make my S13 better?!! no it means the other guy couldnt drive.

Honda S2000 Factory 1/4 Time 14.1
BMW Z4 Factory 1/4 Time 14.2

Now i dont expect you to be a great driver, but the z4 is not lighting fast, nor should you base your decisions on YOU BEATING YO BOI IN A SKREET RACE!


Why does it not surprise me that you can't have a debate w/out resorting to name calling..?
and what's with the ever so "clever" usage of ebonics?:rolleyes:


So you managed to pull some numbers from wherever to prove that the S2k that you were deepthroating is dead even with the Z4...Congrats...You must be a Rhodes Scholar, or something like one....:goodjob:

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:55 PM
Why does it not surprise me that you can't have a debate w/out resorting to name calling..?
and what's with the ever so "clever" usage of ebonics?:rolleyes:


So you managed to pull some numbers from wherever to prove that the S2k that you were deepthroating is dead even with the Z4...Congrats...You must be a Rhodes Scholar, or something like one....:goodjob:

hey i just call them like i see them.

you told someone to base buying a car on you having a street race with a buddy of yours. Wow, thats really intelligent


I however posted FACTUAL DATA from CREDIBLE SOURCES that have conducted THOUSANDS OF TESTS.

Now i have alos driven an S2000 and i have driven a Z4, my uncle used to own one. The Z4 is a PIG, its sloppy, an doesnt have anywhere near the fun of an S2000.

In a 1/4 mile race the S2000 is faster, but we can say they are dead even.

Go find track time of the Z4 and an S2000 an im willing to bet the S2000 is faster by a good bit.

Its overrated just like the Z3 was.

I suppose you love the $100,000 z8 too

You cant even compare a S2K to a Z4. They arent even in the same league. Its like comparing an SC430 to a Ferrari 355 Spyder.

The Z4 is ok if you like luxury, expensive repair bills, and a slow car.

the S2000 is great for a track, mountain car, cheap to maintain, and is deadly on a road course or twisty road.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 08:57 PM
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/nvc/edmunds/VehicleComparison?op=0&tab=pricing&isbasecar=false&modelid=&styleid=&refid=&maxvehicles=5&vehicleindex=&removestyle=&numCars=2&just=center&disclaimer=false&modelId0=100524510&styleId0=100954196&modelId1=100524309&styleId1=100946086



10k price diff you say?:rolleyes:

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 08:59 PM
MSRP of the S2k was $34000 for the base model

MSRP of the Z4 with the 3.0SI was $41000

* MSRP: $36,700 - $41,700
* Invoice: $33,945 - $39,465

* Fuel Economy Range: 28 mpg Hwy, 18 mpg City
* NHTSA Driver's Crash Rating:
* Basic Warranty: 48 months/50,000 miles
* Fuel Type: premium unleaded

sorry i was off $3000. But i bet the dealer mark up on a BMW is alot more than a Honda

Plus the car you are quoting at $36,000 is the one that makes 215hp. I chose the Convertible Roadster that makes 255hp, since that is the one that is most relevant.

That car is $41,000 an it has a 255hp I6 3.0si http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-Z4-2008/pricing-and-incentivesan weighs 3700lbs

http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-Z4-2008/specs

Echonova
06-17-2008, 09:01 PM
Why don't both of you calm down.













Besides we all know my car is the best.

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:05 PM
Sounds like i know more about z4s than he does

Alan®
06-17-2008, 09:05 PM
Your Eclipse FTL.
I know I'm trying to get rid of it and get another one but eh... money is tight right now as always so.......

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:06 PM
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/nvc/edmunds/VehicleComparison?op=0&tab=pricing&isbasecar=false&modelid=&styleid=&refid=&maxvehicles=5&vehicleindex=&removestyle=&numCars=2&just=center&disclaimer=false&modelId0=100524510&styleId0=100954196&modelId1=100524309&styleId1=100946086



10k price diff you say?:rolleyes:
Here ill make it easy for you

CLICKY POW (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/nvc/edmunds/VehicleComparison;jsessionid=LYtJJ7f1NvRnT529vydzy 4cyN32vGG6GpQZ3CxFdvLLW1bxPzgCz!2083728625?op=0&tab=pricing&isbasecar=false&modelid=100524510&styleid=&refid=&maxvehicles=5&vehicleindex=&removestyle=&numCars=2&just=center&disclaimer=false&modelId0=100524510&styleId0=100954197&modelId1=100524309&styleId1=100946086)

x Resilience
06-17-2008, 09:08 PM
Sounds like Google know more about z4s than he does

Fixed it for you. :goodjob:

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:09 PM
hey i just call them like i see them.

you told someone to base buying a car on you having a street race with a buddy of yours. Wow, thats really intelligent


I however posted FACTUAL DATA from CREDIBLE SOURCES that have conducted THOUSANDS OF TESTS.

Now i have alos driven an S2000 and i have driven a Z4, my uncle used to own one. The Z4 is a PIG, its sloppy, an doesnt have anywhere near the fun of an S2000.

In a 1/4 mile race the S2000 is faster, but we can say they are dead even.

Go find track time of the Z4 and an S2000 an im willing to bet the S2000 is faster by a good bit.

Its overrated just like the Z3 was.

I suppose you love the $100,000 z8 too

You cant even compare a S2K to a Z4. They arent even in the same league. Its like comparing an SC430 to a Ferrari 355 Spyder.

The Z4 is ok if you like luxury, expensive repair bills, and a slow car.

the S2000 is great for a track, mountain car, cheap to maintain, and is deadly on a road course or twisty road.



You're questioning my intelligence but yet you're basing my opinion on ONE statement that I made...:rolleyes:

I'm glad all those years of bouncing around from shop to shop has yielded you all the abilty to be the pseudo omniscient scholar you believe yourself to be....


So being the educated individual that you believe yourself to be, you would be able to conclude that driving one Z4 would not qualify as an educated study / experience into the Z4, correct?


If by your own admission and facts that you so kindly provided, wouldn't logic dictate that the s2k would not walk all over a z4 as you stated? BMW offers just as good of a warranty for the Z4 as Honda does for the S2k. So that being said your logic is once again flawed.


You really should stick to what you do best...answering phone calls and being a gopher....:goodjob:

x Resilience
06-17-2008, 09:09 PM
I know I'm trying to get rid of it and get another one but eh... money is tight right now as always so.......

Good luck, you should get an E36 :D

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:11 PM
MSRP of the S2k was $34000 for the base model

MSRP of the Z4 with the 3.0SI was $41000

* MSRP: $36,700 - $41,700
* Invoice: $33,945 - $39,465

* Fuel Economy Range: 28 mpg Hwy, 18 mpg City
* NHTSA Driver's Crash Rating:
* Basic Warranty: 48 months/50,000 miles
* Fuel Type: premium unleaded

sorry i was off $3000. But i bet the dealer mark up on a BMW is alot more than a Honda

Plus the car you are quoting at $36,000 is the one that makes 215hp. I chose the Convertible Roadster that makes 255hp, since that is the one that is most relevant.

That car is $41,000 an it has a 255hp I6 3.0si http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-Z4-2008/pricing-and-incentivesan weighs 3700lbs

http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-Z4-2008/specs



Hey genius...the Si is not the basic model.....:goodjob:

Alan®
06-17-2008, 09:12 PM
Good luck, you should get an E36 :D
no thanks

Echonova
06-17-2008, 09:15 PM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x249/Echonova1/Ivy.gif

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:16 PM
You're questioning my intelligence but yet you're basing my opinion on ONE statement that I made...:rolleyes:

I'm glad all those years of bouncing around from shop to shop has yielded you all the abilty to be the pseudo omniscient scholar you believe yourself to be....


So being the educated individual that you believe yourself to be, you would be able to conclude that driving one Z4 would not qualify as an educated study / experience into the Z4, correct?


If by your own admission and facts that you so kindly provided, wouldn't logic dictate that the s2k would not walk all over a z4 as you stated? BMW offers just as good of a warranty for the Z4 as Honda does for the S2k. So that being said your logic is once again flawed.


You really should stick to what you do best...answering phone calls and being a gopher....:goodjob:






Now whose name calling LOL!

I wont comment on the bouncing from shop to shop, because thats another topic all together thant has nothing to do with this.

If you would like to discuss my Gophering in person please, feel free to call me or setup an appt with me, id be happy to discuss it face to face.

Now, you are ABSOLUTELY right. My one driving experience doesnt qualify me to be all knowing on the z4. But, i was merely stating the same opinion you have. However, based on facts, my years of bouncing from shop to shop, interacting with customers, countless webboards, personal experience, personal driving experience, talking to people that road race, professional road an drag racers, etc etc etc i can form a more accurate assessment of what car i think is better.

Now, i never said anything to you, you are the one that came after me. I merely said IMO that the Z4 sucked in comparison to any other car mentionedi n this thread. You are the one that went off half cocked about how the car is so bad ass cause you walked your boys s2k on the highway.

I think if you took a survey of 100 people, 90% would say the S2000 is a better car than the overgrown, underpowered z4.

In relation to this topic, i was advising the OP that IN MY OPINION , and also i provided factual data as well as personal experience, that the S2000 or a C5 Corvette was a much better buy for the money.

I still stand by that statement.

Gopher out. Remember to get me something for secretary day ;)

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:18 PM
Hey genius...the Si is not the basic model.....:goodjob:
hey dumbass

the 3.0I that costs $36,000 , MAKES 215HP!

the 3.0SI costs $41,000, MAKES 255HP

I WAS COMPARING RELEVANT MODELS IN REGARDS TO HP

If you want we can compare the even more underpowered 3.0I that still costs $2500 more, and is EVEN SLOWER

Alan®
06-17-2008, 09:19 PM
I still like a SLK32 over the Z4 or the S2k

Echonova
06-17-2008, 09:20 PM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x249/Echonova1/touristcamera8yh8.jpg

JITB
06-17-2008, 09:22 PM
Z4/SLK is kind of a grown mans car, and the s2k/Z/miata are different cars for young folks.. i cant compare the two..

If ihad a Z4 and a s2k in front of me id take the Z4 home!

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:25 PM
Now whose name calling LOL!

I wont comment on the bouncing from shop to shop, because thats another topic all together thant has nothing to do with this.

If you would like to discuss my Gophering in person please, feel free to call me or setup an appt with me, id be happy to discuss it face to face.

Now, you are ABSOLUTELY right. My one driving experience doesnt qualify me to be all knowing on the z4. But, i was merely stating the same opinion you have. However, based on facts, my years of bouncing from shop to shop, interacting with customers, countless webboards, personal experience, personal driving experience, talking to people that road race, professional road an drag racers, etc etc etc i can form a more accurate assessment of what car i think is better.

Now, i never said anything to you, you are the one that came after me. I merely said IMO that the Z4 sucked in comparison to any other car mentionedi n this thread. You are the one that went off half cocked about how the car is so bad ass cause you walked your boys s2k on the highway.

I think if you took a survey of 100 people, 90% would say the S2000 is a better car than the overgrown, underpowered z4.

In relation to this topic, i was advising the OP that IN MY OPINION , and also i provided factual data as well as personal experience, that the S2000 or a C5 Corvette was a much better buy for the money.

I still stand by that statement.

Gopher out. Remember to get me something for secretary day ;)



LOL.....need I remind you that it was YOU who came after ME by calling me an IDIOT?

ANY person with common sense would read that as an attempted insult.
I simply returned the favor and now you want to play the victim role?:rolleyes: Get over yourself.


and I'm sure the issue of the Z4 vs. the S2k has been such a hot topic issue in the shops you've worked at....:no:

Whatever the case, on the matter of what car is better for the money, it is quite subjective.....One person could be looking for luxury, comfort, and resale value while another could be looking at a car simply for the fun factor....:goodjob:

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:26 PM
I still like a SLK32 over the Z4 or the S2k

2004 SLK32 AMG. MSRP $56170

Thats not even in the same league either that car is $20,000 more LOL

for $55-60,000 id rather have a C6 Vette or BOxster S if i wanted a convertible or maybe even an M3

twinj
06-17-2008, 09:26 PM
I have a buick for sale. Just thought I would throw that out there.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:27 PM
hey dumbass

the 3.0I that costs $36,000 , MAKES 215HP!

the 3.0SI costs $41,000, MAKES 255HP

I WAS COMPARING RELEVANT MODELS IN REGARDS TO HP

If you want we can compare the even more underpowered 3.0I that still costs $2500 more, and is EVEN SLOWER


You said base to base, for the sake of price comparison, correct?:thinking:

Yea, that's what I thought....:goodjob:

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:29 PM
Oh and since you issued the invitation to meet in person to have a "talk", all you have to do is tell me when. You billy badass you.....LOLOLOLOL.

Lucky DAWG
06-17-2008, 09:29 PM
Why does it not surprise me that you can't have a debate w/out resorting to name calling..?
and what's with the ever so "clever" usage of ebonics?:rolleyes:


So you managed to pull some numbers from wherever to prove that the S2k that you were deepthroating is dead even with the Z4...Congrats...You must be a Rhodes Scholar, or something like one....:goodjob:




if someone just explained to me the theory of relativity from cover to cover and went over every small possible detail with me so i could win a nobel prize myself, and then finished the conversation with....



YO BOI IN A SKREET RACE!




...i will take nothing they said seriously

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:30 PM
if someone just explained to me the theory of relativity from cover to cover and went over every small possible detail with me so i could win a nobel prize myself, and then finished the conversation with....



YO BOI IN A SKREET RACE!




...i will take nothing they said seriously



LOL...:lmfao:

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:31 PM
LOL.....need I remind you that it was YOU who came after ME by calling me an IDIOT?

ANY person with common sense would read that as attempted insult.
I simply returned the favor and now you want to play the victim role?:rolleyes: Get over yourself.


and I'm sure the issue of the Z4 vs. the S2k has been such a hot topic issue in the shops you've worked at....:no:

Whatever the case, on the matter of what car is better for the money, it is quite subjective.....One person could be looking for luxury, comfort, and resale value while another could be looking at a car simply for the fun factor....:goodjob:

Jesus christ do you even ****ing read these posts?

Read #62 then #65

Then your brilliant street racing post #70

I called you an idiot for advising someone to buy a car based on


I guess you've never run against, seen or heard a z4m at wot huh?

And


When I first got my car I raced a friend who owns an s2k, stock for stock, light to light and freeway runs and I beat him EVERY TIME.... Explain that...

Im sorry but those statments are IDIOTIC. SOrry you dont agree with me

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:33 PM
Oh and since you issued the invitation to meet in person to have a "talk", all you have to do is tell me when. You billy badass you.....LOLOLOLOL.
hey you are the one that wanted to explain to me what you think i have done the last 7 years.

By all means, let me know when you would like to talk.

Thats not being a badass, thats me telling you that id love to explain to you what you THINK you know.

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:35 PM
You said base to base, for the sake of price comparison, correct?:thinking:

Yea, that's what I thought....:goodjob:
I dont think i ever said BASE VERSUS BASE

I mean it makes no difference to me, lets compare the 215hp 3600lb car to the 240hp 2800lb car.

Still, i fail to see where you make any sort of relevance. Even in your scenario the S2k is still a better car.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:35 PM
MSRP of the S2k was $34000 for the base model

MSRP of the Z4 with the 3.0SI was $41000




Base model, huh?

Now, is the si the base model?

Alan®
06-17-2008, 09:37 PM
2004 SLK32 AMG. MSRP $56170

Thats not even in the same league either that car is $20,000 more LOL

for $55-60,000 id rather have a C6 Vette or BOxster S if i wanted a convertible or maybe even an M3
Yea but he mentioned something about a 25k price limit you can easily get one with decent miles on it for that price.

This is a lil high on the miles but you get the idea.http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-Trucks___Supercharged-Cabrio-Roadster-AMG-2Tone-Leather-Alloy-Cd_W0QQitemZ190227062444QQddnZCarsQ20Q26Q20TrucksQ QddiZ2282QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item190227062444&

Echonova
06-17-2008, 09:38 PM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x249/Echonova1/funny-1.jpg

twinj
06-17-2008, 09:40 PM
this thread has reached its climax.

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:40 PM
Jesus christ do you even ****ing read these posts?

Read #62 then #65

Then your brilliant street racing post #70

I called you an idiot for advising someone to buy a car based on



And



Im sorry but those statments are IDIOTIC. SOrry you dont agree with me



What does quoting me do to further your argument?


So based on MY experiences with MY car against S2k's, your facts on performance, car vs car, are further validated thus proving your whole " the s2k blows to the Z4 out of the water" to be erroneous....:goodjob:



Edit: Thank you for proving my point which was YOU started with the petty bs name calling....You said your piece, I said mine, keep it moving....

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:44 PM
I'm sure there's a shop floor somewhere that needs sweeping. Get on your job and off of my nuts. Thanks in advance....

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:47 PM
Base model, huh?

Now, is the si the base model?

Again, earth to Dunkswhore, Earth to DunksWhore.

I quoted a BASE MODEL S2000 with 240hp

to

A 3.0SI Model 255hp BMW Z4 that was Mid Level

I can see your just grasping at straws now, trying to "win" so to speak when in reality your making yourself look dumber man.

I mean if you want we can compare the LOWER BASE MODEL OF THE Z4 that is SLOWER than the BASE MODEL AND CHEAPER S2000.

But since you recommended the


I fuked up a few s2ks in the time that I owned my car. I would recommend the 3.0

I naturally assume you meant the HIGHER HP 3.0SI model so thats what i used for my comparison.

But for arguments sake lets compare shall we

You said

http://www.edmunds.com/apps/nvc/edmunds/VehicleComparison?op=0&tab=pricing&isbasecar=false&modelid=&styleid=&refid=&maxvehicles=5&vehicleindex=&removestyle=&numCars=2&just=center&disclaimer=false&modelId0=100524510&styleId0=100954196&modelId1=100524309&styleId1=100946086



10k price diff you say?:rolleyes:


Now if you look at that you will see the price difference is only about $2000. But the car is INFERIOR compared to the SI version.

Your CHEAPER has less HP, less TQ, Not even an LSD is offered.

1/4 mile Time compared by CAR AN DRIVE Is 14.6 so it is slower than the other model.


So again, if you owned some 3.0I 215hp Z4 that weighed 3600lbs an some how it was GODS CHARIOT AN DESTROYED S2Ks at stoplights an highways, congratulations you are the MAN!

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:49 PM
I'm sure there's a shop floor somewhere that needs sweeping. Get on your job and off of my nuts. Thanks in advance....

Sorry but you have me confused with someone else. I never was a janitor.

But i have all the time in the world, its nice being your own boss.

Maybe one day ill hire you :tongue1:

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 09:53 PM
Again, earth to Dunkswhore, Earth to DunksWhore.

I quoted a BASE MODEL S2000 with 240hp

to

A 3.0SI Model 255hp BMW Z4 that was Mid Level

I can see your just grasping at straws now, trying to "win" so to speak when in reality your making yourself look dumber man.

I mean if you want we can compare the LOWER BASE MODEL OF THE Z4 that is SLOWER than the BASE MODEL AND CHEAPER S2000.

But since you recommended the


I naturally assume you meant the HIGHER HP 3.0SI model so thats what i used for my comparison.

But for arguments sake lets compare shall we

You said



Now if you look at that you will see the price difference is only about $2000. But the car is INFERIOR compared to the SI version.

Your CHEAPER has less HP, less TQ, Not even an LSD is offered.

1/4 mile Time compared by CAR AN DRIVE Is 14.6 so it is slower than the other model.


So again, if you owned some 3.0I 215hp Z4 that weighed 3600lbs an some how it was GODS CHARIOT AN DESTROYED S2Ks at stoplights an highways, congratulations you are the MAN!




I thought you were done with the thread??:rolleyes:


Fact is you said base to base. Again, base to base. You never made mention of comparing simply on performance numbers. Base to base. What about that do you not get?


I never claimed that my car was the hottest shyt to come out since sliced bread. I simply compared it to a specific car. Do me a favor: Keep it moving.

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 09:57 PM
[color=#000000]Fact is you said base to base. Again, base to base. You never made mention of comparing simply on performance numbers. Base to base. What about that do you not get?

READ MOTHERF*CKER

YOU EVEN QUOTED ME YOURSELF


Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
MSRP of the S2k was $34000 for the base model

MSRP of the Z4 with the 3.0SI was $41000

I SAID BASE MODEL S2000 VERSUS 3.0SI ITS IN CLEAR ENGLISH JUST CAUSE YOU ASSUMED I MEANT SOMETHING ELSE THATS YOUR PROBLEM LOL

Now if i would have said


Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
MSRP of the S2k was $34000 for the base model

MSRP of the Z4 with the 3.0SI BASE MODEL $41000

Then you would have an argument, all you have right now is a bunch of LOLs from me.

Echonova
06-17-2008, 09:59 PM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x249/Echonova1/priceless-car-models.jpg

Vteckidd
06-17-2008, 10:00 PM
ITs been fun, but im going to go play Metal Gear now.

Cheers

BlkCD5
06-17-2008, 10:02 PM
how bout a poll?

BobbyFresco
06-17-2008, 10:04 PM
READ MOTHERF*CKER

YOU EVEN QUOTED ME YOURSELF



I SAID BASE MODEL S2000 VERSUS 3.0SI ITS IN CLEAR ENGLISH JUST CAUSE YOU ASSUMED I MEANT SOMETHING ELSE THATS YOUR PROBLEM LOL

Now if i would have said



Then you would have an argument, all you have right now is a bunch of LOLs from me.


So now you want to twist shyt around for your convenience?

Go back to where you initially quoted the z4 as being 10k more than the S.

Now, did you specify in any manner in which way you were making your comparison...?

Hm..., you didnt....:goodjob:



and so in an effort to prove your point about the cost of a base model S versus a Z4 you choose the midlevel model....:rolleyes:

We may have been arguing about two diff things the whole entire time and not known it but it does not change the fact that the choice/opinion on what is better is subjective according to wants and needs in a particular car. Point blank...And I've already said as much. I'm not a rodeo show so stop riding my nuts....;)


At the end of the day, one thing is a given: the two cars perform similarly.
The question is if the extra ameneties that come with the BMW are worth the price tag.

BlkCD5
06-17-2008, 10:08 PM
how is the Z4's suspension? Some reviews said that it has a harsh, bumpy ride.

03RCode
06-17-2008, 10:17 PM
I know where an 04 Saleen S281 vert is for $26,000. 17,000 miles, every saleen option minus the supercharger... Amazing car. PM me if your interested.

Brett
06-18-2008, 06:17 AM
I think if you took a survey of 100 people, 90% would say the S2000 is a better car than the overgrown, underpowered z4.


Make it 91%, add me!! LOL

The Z4 is butt ass ugly, Its heavy, slow, Over rated, a b*tch car and has no back bone in the mountains or really anywhere, and unless you love to suck D*ck, dont buy a Z4. :goodjob:

Brett
06-18-2008, 06:19 AM
and so in an effort to prove your point about the cost of a base model S versus a Z4 you choose the midlevel model....:rolleyes:
.

There is no BASELEVEL S2k as you say, The car doesnt really have options, Hardtop is pretty much one of the ONLY options (Unless you add lip spoiler and rear wing) but the car pretty much comes with everything for the 34k price, No gimicky add ons like the BMW

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:04 AM
There is no BASELEVEL S2k as you say, The car doesnt really have options, Hardtop is pretty much one of the ONLY options (Unless you add lip spoiler and rear wing) but the car pretty much comes with everything for the 34k price, No gimicky add ons like the BMW



I didn't introduce the notion of a base model S2k into this conversation(it was Mr Kidd that did) but for the sake of argument here you go:


http://www.edmunds.com/honda/s2000/2008/index.html#search=open.eq..amp.p.eq.cvehicledata%2 3%23-1%23%23-1%7E%7Ef64%7C%7C436f6e7665727469626c65%7E%7Enf13%7 C%7C2433354b202d202434354b

Vteckidd
06-18-2008, 08:07 AM
bret there is a base model because in 2008 there is the track edition cr

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:07 AM
Make it 91%, add me!! LOL

The Z4 is butt ass ugly, Its heavy, slow, Over rated, a b*tch car and has no back bone in the mountains or really anywhere, and unless you love to suck D*ck, dont buy a Z4. :goodjob:



I've personally seen more women driving the s2k than the Z4.:goodjob:

You had a Civic before didn't you? How many girls drive that?
So is the Civic then to be considered a bytch car?:thinking:

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:09 AM
[QUOTE=Mr. KiDD]bret there is a base model because in 2008 there is the track edition cr[/QUOTE


Thank you for clarifying that. At least one thing we agree on...:cheers:

ksniperfox
06-18-2008, 08:32 AM
bmwZ=slow..

Ran
06-18-2008, 08:33 AM
Go back to where you initially quoted the z4 as being 10k more than the S.

and so in an effort to prove your point about the cost of a base model S versus a Z4 you choose the midlevel model....:rolleyes: For a fair performance comparison, the $8K more expensive version of the Z4 was used since it was the one most competitive with the S2K in terms of 1/4 mile times and such. Had the comparison involved only price, then the Z4 Base could have be used. However, at that point the S2K pretty much walks away from the Z4 Base in terms of performance. The midlevel Z4 had to be used to compare the performance aspect. When weighing both price and performance (bang for buck) between the two models, you will wind up paying a lot more for a Z4 as to a comparible S2K.


At the end of the day, one thing is a given: the two cars perform similarly.Depending on the price you're willing to pay.

Hope that helps to clear some of the fog. :cheers:

©hris
06-18-2008, 08:36 AM
.... holy ****.

Ran
06-18-2008, 08:37 AM
.... holy ****.Feel loved yet? lol

©hris
06-18-2008, 08:37 AM
btw i drove the car home last night and i LOVE IT!!! its the 3.0 v6. not the 2.5.


im prob gonna buy it

©hris
06-18-2008, 08:38 AM
Feel loved yet? lol

lol im gonna have to read all these responses on my lunch break. lol

Ran
06-18-2008, 08:38 AM
btw i drove the car home last night and i LOVE IT!!! its the 3.0 v6. not the 2.5.


im prob gonna buy itWhich car? The Z4?

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:42 AM
That said, the record shows that the Z4 makes bigger numbers on the test track than any of the others, if only by a shade. The 5.3-second 0-to-60 squeaked ahead of the Honda by 0.1 second and out front of the Nissan by twice that. The quarter-mile blurs past in 14 seconds flat, again 0.1 second ahead of the Honda, and this time, 0.3 up on the 350Z. All three clock an identical 99 mph in the distance. The BMW leads in top speed at 152 mph, with the Nissan and Porsche close behind at 148. The governed Audi hangs back at 125 mph.

Same story on the skidpad, where the BMW and the Honda tie at 0.92 g, a mere 0.01 behind the Porsche and 0.04 ahead of the Nissan.

(This is an excerpt of an article by Car and Driver in 03 comparing the Z4, 350z, Audi TT, Porsche Boxster, and Honda S2000)

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:44 AM
btw i drove the car home last night and i LOVE IT!!! its the 3.0 v6. not the 2.5.


im prob gonna buy it


:goodjob: Do it...I would recommend for you to have the oil level sensor looked at to make sure it's working properly....

Bruce Leroy
06-18-2008, 08:47 AM
btw i drove the car home last night and i LOVE IT!!! its the 3.0 v6. not the 2.5.


im prob gonna buy it


sorry to nitpick but...

It doesn't have a v6, its an Inline.... you sound like my girlfriend saying my civic has a v4

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 08:51 AM
For a fair performance comparison, the $8K more expensive version of the Z4 was used since it was the one most competitive with the S2K in terms of 1/4 mile times and such. Had the comparison involved only price, then the Z4 Base could have be used. However, at that point the S2K pretty much walks away from the Z4 Base in terms of performance. The midlevel Z4 had to be used to compare the performance aspect. When weighing both price and performance (bang for buck) between the two models, you will wind up paying a lot more for a Z4 as to a comparible S2K.

Depending on the price you're willing to pay.

Hope that helps to clear some of the fog. :cheers:



I was being a smartass and taking his argument points literally just to fuk with him..

and.....of course the Bimmer is more costly....It's BMW! Yes, you're paying for the name.
Yes, you're paying for extra shyt, and some people would rather have all the extras.....I personally enjoyed and felt it was worth paying extra for heated seats, satellite radio, sport springs, and all the other things my car came with.....Some ppl might just need the bare minimum.....It's all up to checkbook and preferences....:goodjob:

Ran
06-18-2008, 08:57 AM
I was being a smartass and taking his argument points literally just to fuk with him..

and.....of course the Bimmer is more costly....It's BMW! Yes, you're paying for the name.
Yes, you're paying for extra shyt, and some people would rather have all the extras.....I personally enjoyed and felt it was worth paying extra for heated seats, satellite radio, sport springs, and all the other things my car came with.....Some ppl might just need the bare minimum.....It's all up to checkbook and preferences....:goodjob: Very true. Probably why I went with my Mazdaspeed MX-5 Miata when I did. Turbocharged, 6-speed, LSD, 6-Disk CD Changer, easy to work on, and under $20K brand new. :D

BobbyFresco
06-18-2008, 09:41 AM
Hey Chris....the Z4 you're looking at getting....Sport and Premium package?
Just based off of the pics, looks to be just like mine...

Brett
06-18-2008, 11:16 AM
bret there is a base model because in 2008 there is the track edition cr

Yeah but that doesnt make the regular S2k a BASE model, The CR edition is a different model edition.

Vteckidd
06-18-2008, 11:33 AM
Yeah but that doesnt make the regular S2k a BASE model, The CR edition is a different model edition.
well edmunds used the term BASE MODEL S2000 and TRACK CR EDITION so i just used BASE MODEL to avoid any confusion

I would tend to agree with you though because the CR edition is more money and has no AC no radio, etc.

AN its limited production so almost no one is buying it IMO.

In all reality 98% of S2000 sales will be the "BASE MODEL" which might as well be the only model

allmotoronly
06-19-2008, 02:55 PM
well edmunds used the term BASE MODEL S2000 and TRACK CR EDITION so i just used BASE MODEL to avoid any confusion

I would tend to agree with you though because the CR edition is more money and has no AC no radio, etc.

AN its limited production so almost no one is buying it IMO.

In all reality 98% of S2000 sales will be the "BASE MODEL" which might as well be the only model

I saw one on I-75 the other day going through macon. There was a black guy driving it...

sogood
06-20-2008, 02:09 AM
Make it 91%, add me!! LOL

The Z4 is butt ass ugly, Its heavy, slow, Over rated, a b*tch car and has no back bone in the mountains or really anywhere, and unless you love to suck D*ck, dont buy a Z4. :goodjob:

:lmao: That's rich, and I don't even really like Z4's.