Motor Trend reviews the 2009 BMW X6: Perfectly pointless

[1SICKLEX]

And I tend to agree... Whoever buys the X6 must be one confused about what he/she really wants.

http://blogs.motortrend.com/6244088/auto-review/2009-bmw-x6-perfectly-pointless/index.html

I grabbed the keys to the BMW X6 last night. By the time I got home I was wondering whether, in a quiet corner of the FIZ, BMW's giant engineering center in Munich, a bunch of engineers were crying into their weissbier over this thing.

Don't get me wrong, the X6 -- in this case the six-cylinder version -- is an impressive piece of work. The 3.0-liter turbocharged engine is smooth and torquey and punches the X6 hard away from the lights. The ride is beautifully controlled, a huge improvement on the first-gen X5, which bounced around like a Conestoga wagon on the Oregon Trail. It changes direction with near sport-sedan alacrity.

But driving the BMW X6 hard is a bit like watching an elephant tap dance -- you're left faintly bemused by the whole act, but not entirely sure it belongs anywhere outside a circus. I couldn't help wonder how much time and effort it took the BMW engineers to make this 4894-pound truck perform like, well, a BMW. More to the point, I wondered whether deep down the BMW engineers, car guys all, thought the X6 a waste of their talent. You see, good as it is, the X6 is still a truck. A perfectly pointless truck.

A Ferrari 599GTB has a point. A Toyota Prius has a point. A Ford F-150 has a point. But what, exactly, is the point of a BMW X6? Despite all the clever engineering, it still manages to artfully combine all the disadvantages of a tight-fitting coupe with all the downsides of a big SUV. The result is a vehicle that can't go off-road or carry as much stuff as a regular SUV and doesn't quite go around corners as well -- or use fuel as efficiently -- as any comparable BMW car.

I guess the point the X6 proves is the auto business has long ceased to be about transportation. The auto business is really a fashion business. The X6 exists only because BMW's marketing mavens are convinced there are enough of you out there who want an SUV that thinks it's a coupe. And judging by the approving looks and thumbs up grins our test X6 is generating on L.A.'s streets, it seems they might be right.

http://image.motortrend.com/f/auto-review/2009-bmw-x6-perfectly-pointless/9746650+cr1+re0+ar1/2009-bmw-x6-front-three-quarter.jpg

http://image.motortrend.com/f/auto-review/2009-bmw-x6-perfectly-pointless/9746656+cr1+re0+ar1/2009-bmw-x6-rear-three-quarter.jpg

http://image.motortrend.com/f/auto-review/2009-bmw-x6-perfectly-pointless/9746653+cr1+re0+ar1/2009-bmw-x6-side.jpg

[gforce23]

BMW is trying to promote it as the "sportiest" sport utility vehicle. Nothing wrong with that IMO. Besides BMW's X range, the RR Sport and a couple of other SUVs, none of the rest have any characteristics that lean toward the "sport" bit of an SUV. No wonder these are classified as 4*4s in Britain and elsewhere.
Besides, white on such a big ass car looks crap.. I have seen a few in Burgundy and Black.. looks much better IMO.

[.blank cd]

That thing looks like a lifted 3 series to me


1 series FTW tho! I saw one of those out on Barrett thursday afternoon. mmm mmm mmm

[gforce23]

Hmm.. I still think the 3xx coupe w/aero kit looks much better than the 128 or 135 with standard M-tech kit. But the 1xx's interior >>> 3xx's interior. Gotta love that pop-up nav display!
But the biggest problem is the price difference of only ~5k. I configured both a month back when I was thinking of placing an order for one but IMO why not get the slightly more roomier 335i.. those proper dual exhausts look much better.

[Frög]

its made for soccer moms.. thats what its made for..

[STI101]

Man its got to be hard to see out of that back window.