PDA

View Full Version : Cars R35 GTR vs Gallardo Superleggera



OUTLAW
05-01-2008, 09:26 AM
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/R35-GTR-vs-Gallardo-Superleggera_158711.htm

manilikecars
05-01-2008, 11:11 AM
wow can't believe it beat it

guinness
05-01-2008, 11:17 AM
HOLY ****!!!****ing awesome!!!!just toobad that he guy who dedsigned the new gtr says that the way it's tuned is the perfect tuning for the car and that as of right now he has pretty much made that car mod-proof.

MistaCee
05-01-2008, 11:33 AM
wow that GTR is very impressive

Bruce Leroy
05-01-2008, 11:38 AM
The lambo sounds soooooo sexy.

AnthonyF
05-02-2008, 11:53 AM
ummm...the GTR had a jump...did no1 catch that?

OUTLAW
05-02-2008, 12:19 PM
stop hatin on the gt-r
ummm...the GTR had a jump...did no1 catch that?

AnthonyF
05-02-2008, 12:45 PM
fuk nissan.

chinitoxamor
05-02-2008, 01:22 PM
fuk nissan.

:lmfao:

redpanda
05-02-2008, 02:19 PM
the gt-r had a tiny jump and the guy wasn't using the launch control. the gallardo is impressive, but at less than half the price, the gt-r is a monster

man
05-03-2008, 04:53 PM
Hmmm... GT-R is slower than I thought if it can only inch by a gallardo (and it had a jump)

RUFFIAN
05-06-2008, 10:12 AM
I agree on the price point and the jump. The Nissan better watch its ass around the new ZR-1.:idb:

tony
05-06-2008, 10:16 AM
Sorry, I'll still take the SL

MistaCee
05-06-2008, 10:22 AM
Sorry, I'll still take the SL

Totally agree but have to admit the GTR is still impressive.

tony
05-06-2008, 10:37 AM
Most certainly the GT-R is impressive and ideally a dream garage would be both but if I had to choose.. SL

Elbow
05-06-2008, 11:34 AM
Would take the Lamborghini, for some reason I have yet to be really impressed by the GTR...it's just, boring. It's a Nissan. It can't be that cool.

EJ25RUN
05-06-2008, 11:41 AM
ummm...the GTR had a jump...did no1 catch that?

Scenario 1 & 2

1. Sleepin at the line is a loss

2. GTR awd system took a shorter time to get it's launch system to go. Besides, the SL had him at 60".

I would still take the "AUDI" over the GTR.

Or would I? .......*ponders*

R32Dragon
05-06-2008, 12:09 PM
Would take the Lamborghini, for some reason I have yet to be really impressed by the GTR...it's just, boring. It's a Nissan. It can't be that cool.

http://www.kurtlow.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/epic-fail.jpg

Bruce Leroy
05-06-2008, 01:01 PM
Hmmm... GT-R is slower than I thought if it can only inch by a gallardo (and it had a jump)


Is a gallardo supposed to be slow or something???

MistaCee
05-06-2008, 01:29 PM
Is a gallardo supposed to be slow or something???

x2 let alone the SL.

man
05-06-2008, 03:33 PM
Is a gallardo supposed to be slow or something???

It has about 40-50hp less than the gtr (according to MT's 507whp on the gtr) So what would you expect?

MistaCee
05-06-2008, 03:36 PM
It has about 40-50hp less than the gtr (according to MT's 507whp on the gtr) So what would you expect?

Actually I think the GTR has 480whp.

EJ25RUN
05-06-2008, 03:39 PM
Actually I think the GTR has 480whp.

http://bp2.blogger.com/_QRzxifkj_bk/Rx_npNXNOvI/AAAAAAAABMc/oYZBAcqxOtc/s1600/big_lie.jpg

man
05-06-2008, 03:40 PM
Actually I think the GTR has 480whp.

Read MT's review, they dyno'd at 507(sorry to the crank, assuming only 15% drivetrain loss) though they estimate it to be more around the 550 range, due to the fact that only 15% loss would be quite a feat with awd. So either Nissan is understating the HP, or they secretly upped the HP on the cars they sent to reviewers. Either way it's kinda suspicious.