Why wikipedia is not a credible source

[Whiteboy™]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

LMFAO, read the top

[Tracy]

wow

[HalfBaked]

So true. So true.

[The Ninja]

Oh ****, lol. I'm drooling on myself laughing so hard.

[Bballjamal]

lol

[ZeDFuNk]

HAHA, THAT'S COMPLETELY CREDIBLE. gotta love it.

[bigdare23]

LOL

[The Ninja]

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Whiteboy™ again.

[bigdare23]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

LMFAO, read the top


What you doing on wikipedia? You can't read

[Whiteboy™]

lick my balls D

[Deke]

Doesn't make a bit of sense to me, but funny none the less. :) I think it's funny how Wikipedia started locking articles whenever Colbert would make a reference to one.

[BABY J]

find of the year!!!! +1

[Whiteboy™]

wikipedia is full of win

[Whiteboy™]

made a motivation pic

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7460/credibilitywb4.png

[The Ninja]

nice

[Leadfoot_mf]

priceless

[Leadfoot_mf]

made a motivation pic

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7460/credibilitywb4.png
thats great :goodjob:

[Leadfoot_mf]

now if it was the 19th amendment then..........

[xLSTONEx]

I wonder what it would say about the 13th???