PDA

View Full Version : If an unstoppable force comes across an unmovable object, then what happens?



thecrazyone
08-22-2007, 04:35 PM
my guess is that he unstoppable force would blow right through the object, because while it's unmovable, it's not indestructible.

bigdare23
08-22-2007, 04:45 PM
:???:

what is the point of this question since there's no such thing?


But my guess would be the "unstoppable force" would stop when it make connect with the "unmovable force", and the "unmoveable force" would move due to the transfer of energy.

Maniaç
08-22-2007, 04:46 PM
Makes sense...

Kevykev
08-22-2007, 04:48 PM
Is the unmovable object porous or solid?

Killer
08-22-2007, 04:55 PM
my guess is that he unstoppable force would blow right through the object, because while it's unmovable, it's not indestructible.

an unstoppable force doesn't mean it's indestructible... right?

Kevykev
08-22-2007, 05:11 PM
Is the Unstoppable force a Trapezoid?

tony
08-22-2007, 05:12 PM
Its impossible to have both, one cancels the other out.

If a force is unstoppable then there is no such thing as an unmovable object and vice versa

Dirty Octopus™
08-22-2007, 05:14 PM
it depends on if its hard or soft :ninja:

mocha latte cupcake
08-22-2007, 05:25 PM
i would say that the juggernaut would lose to the rhombus (sp?) because of its uneven sides and more so for the fact that its made by honda....

Kevykev
08-22-2007, 05:29 PM
i would say that the juggernaut would lose to the rhombus (sp?) because of its uneven sides and more so for the fact that its made by honda....

true that!

s13slider®
08-22-2007, 05:33 PM
i would love to get high with the threadstarter...

MR2DR
08-22-2007, 06:30 PM
i would love to get high with the threadstarter...

i would just like to know where he gets his shit

bigdare23
08-22-2007, 06:39 PM
LOL, after re-reading the thread, I was like "Damn this fucker is high as hell"

Nismo
08-22-2007, 10:54 PM
what if its a gas or a plasma? Then what!

SLOWLYbtngU
08-22-2007, 11:00 PM
:thinking: I like bigdare's answer

redrumracer
08-22-2007, 11:01 PM
well if an unstoppable force comes across an unmovable object then the unstoppable force would keep on being unstoppable and the unmovable object would not be moved because the force went across it and not through it. :D

Elbow
08-22-2007, 11:03 PM
A huge nuclear explosion

ubers2k
08-22-2007, 11:09 PM
what the fuck are you smoking?

ahmonrah
08-22-2007, 11:26 PM
um....dayum!!

RandomGuy
08-22-2007, 11:48 PM
Is the unmovable object porous or solid?
well if you can ask that then its not truely unmoveable. The molecular structure must change for it to change state. For example, parts of it must MOVE in order for it to be liquid or gas. And if they can NOT move, then the non stoppable object cant penetrate them.

Its a retarded scenario. The unmoveable object seems slightly more feasible than the unstoppable object.
But yeah its just retarded, its basically an undefined solution. In a conventional scenario, either the non stoppable object, stops( or bounces or whatever), or the non movable object moves. If the two possible outcomes are taken away that leaves no possible answer.

SixSquared
08-23-2007, 02:22 AM
that is a direct quote from the movie imagine me and you, and the answer is that its a trick question... If a force is truly unstoppable, then no object will be able to hinder it, and likewise if a object is truly unmovable, then no force will be able to move it. Therefore, the two anomalies cannot exist in the same universe, and the question has no answer.

Quit quoting lesbian movies and thinking you are clever.

xLSTONEx
08-23-2007, 02:50 AM
what type of weed are you smoking?

Kevykev
08-23-2007, 09:20 AM
well if you can ask that then its not truely unmoveable. The molecular structure must change for it to change state. For example, parts of it must MOVE in order for it to be liquid or gas. And if they can NOT move, then the non stoppable object cant penetrate them.

Its a retarded scenario. The unmoveable object seems slightly more feasible than the unstoppable object.
But yeah its just retarded, its basically an undefined solution. In a conventional scenario, either the non stoppable object, stops( or bounces or whatever), or the non movable object moves. If the two possible outcomes are taken away that leaves no possible answer.


RONSTOPPABLE!!!



You do understand that I failed to answer this question seriously do to it's nature correct????

thinkfast®
08-23-2007, 09:34 AM
http://ssscott.tripod.com/bang.jpg

Z28
08-23-2007, 09:49 AM
This question was answered when Chuck Norris round-house kicked himself in the face.

Dirty Octopus™
08-23-2007, 10:00 AM
can milk stop water? :thinking:

SixSquared
08-23-2007, 10:24 AM
http://ssscott.tripod.com/bang.jpg

Tripod image hosting is the answer? That's deep...

blackshine007
08-23-2007, 10:28 AM
If an unstoppable force comes across an unmovable object, then what happens?
my guess is that he unstoppable force would blow right through the object, because while it's unmovable, it's not indestructible.
Chuck Norris vs. Mr. T???

iloveboost
08-23-2007, 12:16 PM
They go around the unmovable object because the unstoppable force does not stop.

/thread.