PDA

View Full Version : Cars s2000 going 175mph on the interstate!!!



Mr.MuayThai
08-01-2007, 11:56 PM
This is one bad Sk2! 280kph with a simple conversion to 175mph. That would be 280/1.6 (which is the mph to kph conversion)=175mph. . . I donno? I just wanted to say something stupid. . . But it is right!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW4ggsXmF80

Magnus213
08-02-2007, 12:58 AM
Woo those white markers were going by quickly!

Nemesis
08-02-2007, 07:19 AM
go vtack go!!!!!!

SampaGuy
08-02-2007, 09:01 AM
i dont know how to explain that one
it took him 10 seconds to go from 45mph-100mph which is comparable to like a stock evo, and 300hp wont get u to 175mph. the car sounds NA and i doubt u could get that much power without a turbo in that little 4 banger.

Magnus213
08-02-2007, 11:24 AM
i dont know how to explain that one
it took him 10 seconds to go from 45mph-100mph which is comparable to like a stock evo, and 300hp wont get u to 175mph. the car sounds NA and i doubt u could get that much power without a turbo in that little 4 banger.
I was thinking the same thing. It didn't seem to be accelerating too quickly, but it just kept going and going. I guess I didn't think too much about it because it was in KPH and I was too lazy to convert to MPH.

Nemesis
08-02-2007, 01:21 PM
i dont know how to explain that one
it took him 10 seconds to go from 45mph-100mph which is comparable to like a stock evo, and 300hp wont get u to 175mph. the car sounds NA and i doubt u could get that much power without a turbo in that little 4 banger.


ye who doubts the power of the vtak.

Duke E. Love
08-07-2007, 01:55 PM
it may have a different gear. slower accel. high ass top end (175 mph)

Mr.MuayThai
08-07-2007, 02:21 PM
I did the converting for you. . .

b.a.d. s2000
08-07-2007, 02:45 PM
he was going down hill too, i think that helped.

HeLLo iM iZzY
08-07-2007, 02:57 PM
Actually, it was 281KPH.