ATT: randomguy

[Tasuki_Civic]

you always come up with something different to talk about...help me out here. i cant seem to sleep ...tasuki would like your company.



how you been? every time i hear about you its always a good thing lol or they your weird as hell. which is still a good thing

[RandomGuy]

Homopolar induction is known since many years (1) (2) (3). Many authors think that it defines a new form of interaction with an unknown substratum, so that, to save energy conservation law for energy production (4) (5) (6) (7) it is said that, by homopolar induction, we can extract energy from vacuum.


The conclusion of Dr. Kincheloe (6), (7) corresponds to my experience (8). Using his words (4) (7) "... Known for over 150 years, the Faraday homopolar generator has been claimed to provide a basis for so-called 'free energy' generation, in that under certain conditions the extraction of electrical output energy is not reflected as a corresponding mechanical load to the driving source....


DePalma may have been right in that there is indeed a situation here whereby energy is being obtained from a previously unknown and unexplained source.


This is a conclusion that most scientists and engineers would reject out of hand as being a violation of accepted laws of physics, and if true has incredible implications."


Since over 150 years nobody has been able to verify "clearly" if, when the current flows in the conductors by homopolar structures, THERE A DAMPING FORCE EXISTS (4) (5) (8).


In my experiences, I have never found a damping force (8).


Besides, the structures of homopolar induction are constructed so that IF THE CLASSICAL CONSERVATION OF ENERGY IS SAVED, IT IS CONTRADICTED THE PRINCIPLE OF CONSERVATION OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND OF MOMENTUM (8) (9) (10).

In the studies of homopolar devices, I have considered many disputes if homopolar induction is, or not, relativistically coherent (11) (12). It must be said that, what Einstein adfirms, in his relativistic paper of 1905, contradicts homopolar experiences (as refers Francisco J. Muller in an his letter (12)): "(Einstein words).... THE PHENOMENON HERE [electromagnetic induction) DEPENDS ONLY UPON THE RELATIVE MOTION BETWEEN MAGNET AND CONDUCTOR".


I have called such unknown and unexplained substratum, with which, it might interact an homopolar machine in the production of energy, KETER (8) (the first Sefirot of Khabbalah : i.e. the COSMIC NOTHING) to distinguish it from the inconsistent properties so-called Aether.


I have realized an homopolar machine which has the characteristic to use "rotational brushes" to avoid frictional losses.


I describe here, a simple homopolar mechanical structure that is suitable of several variations.


In the fig. (a) is shown a macroscopic model, suitable, in generalization, to atomic or molecular structures.


The homopolar machine in the upper part of flg. (a) is composited of four ferrite toroidal magnets: F1,F2 which enclose the iron disk Dl (Fl and F2 are attached to Dl); and so, F3, F4, which enclose the iron disk D4 (Fl and F2 are attached to D4).


The magnetic field is directed from right to left in Dl in fig. (a), opposite in D4. The opposite magnetic fields in the disks Dl and D4 are parallel to K axis.


Disks (fixed on K axis) and permanent magnets, rotate together around the axis K (clockwise in fig.(a), if seen from K zone (right in fig.a)). The K axis is made in steel. Rotational brushes, disks D2 and D3, can rotate around Z axis.


They rotate anticlockwise, and are attached to their axis.


Disks D2 and D3 and Z axis are conductors; it is not necessary that they are ferromagnetic.


When all system rotate, Dl, D4, and also D2, D3 have obliviously in modulus the same angular velocity, if, (as in fig.(a)) all four disks have the same diameter.


The two systems: disks D4 Dl and ferrites around K axis and on Z axis rotate in contact. When disk Dl is in contact with disk D2, and disk D4 is in contact with disk D3, as indicated in fig.(a), there exists an electric circuit between the four disks and the two axis. In contacts 4 and 1, the four disk contact zones, have the same velocity, so the friction is zero. The contact force is only normal to circumferences and so it has no component along the radius. The work done by contact force is zero.

[Tasuki_Civic]

http://depalma.pair.com/ColdFusion2.jpg


http://www.rexresearch.com/d5dep.gif